The 2016 variant of this Schwalbe Marathon Supreme has some important improvements over the first generation Supreme. The largest change is that the usage of the exact same OneStar chemical that’s also utilized on Schwalbe’s top end street bicycle tires. The street bike tires which use the OneStar chemical perform good in our rolling resistance evaluation. It is excellent to see Schwalbe is currently employing this speedy compound onto a flying bicycle tire too.

Another change within the older Supreme is a recently designed tread pattern which makes it roll much better and provides the newest Supreme a modern and fresh appearance. Some items which have not changed are the 67 TPI casing with LiteSkin sidewalls along with using an “HD Speed Guard” puncture security coating. Contrary to the Marathon GreenGuard and Plus, this puncture resistance coating is of the lean, but difficult to permeate kind.

Another thing that is new from the 2016 Supreme lineup is a TL-Easy tubeless edition. The Marathon Supreme TL-Easy employs the exact same MicroSkin layer that is also used on the Schwalbe Guru One. Schwalbe maintains rolling resistance of this TL-Easy Supreme to be even lower. For the time being, the TL-Easy is just available from the 37-622 and 42-622 sizes.

All rolling resistance evaluations are conducted on our rolling resistance evaluation system. Read our The Evaluation page for a detailed explanation about how we examine tires.

Do not forget to have a look at the review pages to make it simpler to compare all of tires which were examined.

Tour/E-Bike Overview Mountain Bike Overview Road Bike Overview Fat Bike Overview

Specified fat is unchanged at 440 g, my sample of this 37-622 Supreme comes in at a marginally lower 431 g. The maximum measured diameter onto a 17C rim, in an air pressure of 60 psi, is 35 mm. The measured height is 34 mm. The same as all other Marathon tires, the Supreme is somewhat small for a 37-622 tire.

Measured tread depth is 1.6 mm, which is still adequate for a quick tire and equal to the Marathon Racer (1.5 mm). The maximum depth of the scooter in the middle of this tread is 5.0 mm. A depth of 5 mm is great to get a bicycle like the Marathon Supreme; many other comparable tires come in closer to 4.5 mm. This implies there’s an adequate quantity of rubber to put in down. To the contrary, the sidewalls are extremely thin using a measured depth of just 0.7 mm.

As anticipated, rolling resistance of this Marathon Supreme is lesser compared to the Marathon GreenGuard and Marathon Racer. At the higher end of the atmosphere pressure stove, the Supreme outperforms the Marathon GreenGuard by close to 3 watts. I have to add that the functionality of this Marathon GreenGuard is still quite powerful when we compare it to the Marathon Supreme at comparable air pressures.

At lower air pressures, rolling resistance climbs much faster when compared to the Marathon GreenGuard. In the very low air pressure of 45 psi, rolling resistance between both is almost equivalent. In the very low air pressure of 30 psi, the Marathon GreenGuard stretches its legs and can outperform the Supreme by 1.7 watts. I propose maintaining the Supreme over 45 psi in a load of 42.5 kg.

When digging to those rolling resistance results somewhat deeper, a part of the reason why the Supreme performs worse in lower air pressures is likely from the thick and rigid layer the Marathon GreenGuard utilizes. The Marathon Supreme is a far more elastic tire. To attain the identical comfort level and tire fall, you can conduct a greater air pressure on the Marathon Supreme. A greater air pressure would reduce rolling resistance somewhat longer when compared to the GreenGuard.

Regrettably, I do not have precise data that may tell us just how much a thick and rigid anti-puncture layer impacts relaxation and tire fall. Bear this in mind when comparing the various tires at the Tour/E-Bike category.

From the raw tread puncture test, which measures the force required to puncture the tread of the tire, the Marathon Supreme scores 15 points. 15 points is far better than both the Marathon GreenGuard (14) and Marathon Plus (13). From the sidewall evaluation, it scores only 4 points that’s a below average score.

Since the Marathon Supreme is a considerably thinner scooter than both the Marathon GreenGuard and Plus, it scores lower than both those tires at the Puncture Factor calculation. Puncture Factor Tread remains adequate since the Supreme has both an adequate depth of 5.0 mm and a raw puncture resistance of 15 factors (PF = 75). Puncture Factor Sidewall is extremely low at only 3 points. The minimal sidewall score is the consequence of an easy to puncture, but also very thin sidewall. You can find more information about bike pump target at bikespumps.info/best-bike-pump/.

Even the Schwalbe Marathon Supreme provides an extremely low rolling resistance and very low weight while at precisely the exact same time still providing a nice puncture resistance. I guess that in real life when used in similar relaxation degrees, the Marathon Supreme will provide a much larger edge over wheels with a far thicker and stiffer anti-puncture coating compared to the raw numbers reveal.

I didn’t examine the preceding version of this Marathon Supreme, but the newest version needs to have a lower rolling resistance centered on evaluations of different tires which use the OneStar compound. Regrettably, I can not tell you how it contrasts on the street, where wear and grip are equally as significant.